Abstract
[Display omitted]
•We compared the 8 components of the Human Influence Index (HII) on cause-specific mortality of North American mammals.•Human population density had greatest positive influence on proportion of anthropogenic mortality.•Conservation programs may be enhanced by more strongly considering the effects of human population density to conserve mammal populations.
The Human Influence Index (HII) quantifies anthropogenic landscape pressures by combining eight measures of human influence: human population density, built environments, crop lands, pasture lands, lights, roads, railways and navigable waterways. The comparative influence of the HII components on cause-specific mammal mortality remains unexplored. Using a database of North American mammal cause-specific mortality, we compared the influence of these components on proportion of mammal mortality resulting from harvest, vehicle collision, predation, and overall anthropogenic mortality. Our dataset consisted of 487 studies that monitored the fates of 48,551 individuals across 70 species with 17,837 mortalities of known cause. For both adults and juveniles, human population density best explained proportion of mortality from anthropogenic causes and showed a positive relationship. Human population density also provided best model fit for adult harvest mortality at low HII values. Lights, built environments, and human population density explained similar variation in adult vehicle mortality, whereas human population density provided best fit for vehicle mortality of juveniles. Predation was negatively associated with human population density and provided best model fit for both age classes. Our work indicates that the effectiveness of conservation programs for North American mammals could be enhanced by reducing the negative consequences of human population density.